Mucar 892BT TESTED | Full Coding & Diagnostics Review
I tested the Mucar 892BT on VW, Alfa, Toyota and BMW. I used it for full-system scans, OEM-level coding, live data, bi-di testing, TPMS, DPF regen and used car checks. After months of testing I actually kept this tool as my main go-to scanner for quick diagnostics, coding and helping friends with service jobs.
Affiliate Disclosure: iamcarhacker.com is an Amazon and other affiliate programs Associate. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Full Affiliate disclosure.
Sponsored Warning: I got this product for free to make a review. Despite that, I provide an honest review based on personal testing and share my truthful opinion of the product. Read more in sponsor policy.
Mucar 892BT
Mucar 892BT is a Bluetooth full-system diagnostic tablet with real OEM-level coding.
The tool is light, fast and stable. For everyday diagnostics it feels much quicker than many bigger tablets.
The newest updates added advanced coding, more bi-directional tests and very fast full-car scanning.
Live data is excellent: up to 12 graphs at the same time.
This tool is now the one I personally grab first for scans, coding and used car checks.
I listed multiple places to buy (depending on location), but the cheapest is usually on the Thinkcar official website.
Find the best price
My insights after testing 100+ OBD2 tools

I’ve tested literally hundreds of OBD2 scanners, so let me tell you why I find these the best value for money.
Video review: Testing Mucar 892BT in action
What This Tool Actually Is
Mucar 892BT is a full-system OEM-style diagnostic tablet with:
• ECU coding
• Bi-di testing
• Service resets
• Live data graphs
• Fast full-car scanning
It is not just a Bluetooth dongle. It behaves like a lightweight professional tablet scanner. It is one of the few budget-friendly tools with true multi-brand coding.
Test Results on Real Cars

I tested it on real cars.
Some of cars I work on with this scan tool already:
• Volkswagen
• BMW
• Toyota
• Alfa Romeo 147
• Alfa bench setup
• Porsche 911 (connection failed)
Edit: If your scan tool cannot pair to VCI, make sure to disconnected and push it harder. Better contact solved cars that I had trouble connecting to.
Full-system scan on VW was extremely fast. High-speed scan took under one minute. Other scanners needed 2–3 minutes. Fault detail pages include module info, freeze frame (when supported) and MU AI help.
Other tested cars differs, for example Renault Thalia here took a longer time.

Coding on VW works well. I removed permanent footwell light faults by simply coding that the car does not have footwell lights. After saving the code, the permanent fault cleared instantly.
On Toyota and BMW, OEM-style coding menus worked without issues. Simple customizations were fast and safe.
Bidirectional testing worked on every module that normally supports it:
• Lights
• Indicators
• Wipers
• Fans
• Fuel pump relay
Live data is one of the best parts. I displayed 12 graphs at once and recorded them. This tool is perfect for used-car diagnostics.
On Alfa 147, service functions worked but the odometer write did not change real mileage. The scanner showed “success”, but cluster stayed the same. This Alfa has IMMO/ECU issues, so I do not blame the tool.
DPF regeneration worked normally.

TPMS reset and coding new sensors also worked. You can write ID numbers with scan tool only, but some cars like this Toyota Corolla required using TPMS Venu tool to detect IDs from TPMS sensors wirelessly.

I used the scanner repeatedly on different cars and it became my main tool for quick scans, coding, and helping friends with service tasks.
Manufacturer Specs vs Real Testing
| Area | Manufacturer Claim | What I Saw in Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Full-system scan | Yes | Very fast on VW, stable on BMW/Toyota |
| ECU coding | Advanced OEM coding | Confirmed on VAG, Toyota, BMW |
| Bi-di tests | Yes | Worked well on VW and Alfa |
| Service resets | 15–20 | DPF & TPMS coding successful |
| Live data | Multi-graph | 12 graphs + recording |
| Updates | Lifetime | Confirmed, no extra fees |
Hardware / Software / Plans / Internet Dependency

The tablet is lightweight and fast. Faster than many Xtool tablets I tested recently. Bluetooth VCI connects quickly.
Software is clean and offers:
• Multiple scan modes
• Guided functions (VAG)
• Full coding menus
• Auto Check mileage verification
• Reports and history
No subscription required. Updates are free.
Internet is needed only for online coding features and updates.
Supported Service Resets
In total there are 34+ service resets. Support of course depends on car itself, not everything can be done using scan tool only.

Works well for:
• DPF regeneration
• TPMS reset + coding new sensors
• Steering angle
• Oil service
• EPB
• Battery reset (depends on car)
Good on VAG:
• Coding
• Adaptations
• Guided functions

Good on Toyota:
• Customizations
• Multiple coding entries
Good on BMW:
• Customizations
• Basic adaptations

Not every car allows every reset. But for most daily service tasks, Mucar 892BT is strong.
Supported Languages
English works best.
Other languages exist but translation quality varies.
For serious diagnostics, use English.
Comparison Section
Mucar 892BT vs Xtool D8S

D8S is a larger tablet made for workshops. It has strong bi-di and good service menus. Coding is available but on some cars is less consistent than Mucar 892BT in my testing.
Mucar 892BT is faster, lighter and has better coding for Toyota, VAG and BMW. For daily scans I grab 892BT first.
| Area | Mucar 892BT | Xtool D8S |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | Very good OEM coding | Good but car-dependent |
| Scan speed | Faster | Slower tablet |
| Mobility | Light, Bluetooth | Heavy tablet |
| Bi-di tests | Strong | Strong |
| Services | Good | Very good |
| Key programming | No | Better choice |
D8S is better if you want key programming.
892BT is better for coding + fast diagnostics.
Mucar 892BT vs iCarsoft CR Max+

iCarsoft CR Max+ is simple, stable and easy to use. It still does coding and service but Mucar 892BT services were more reliable, especially for europian vehicles.
Mucar 892BT completely outperforms it in coding, scan speed and live data.
| Area | Mucar 892BT | CR Max+ |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | Yes, OEM style | No |
| Bi-di tests | Strong | Limited |
| Live data | 12 graphs | Basic |
| Scan speed | Very fast | Average |
| Price/value | Excellent | Lower value |
Choose CR Max+ only if you want a basic wired scanner or specifically want cheap scanner for used car checks – for that is good because of mileage check service reset.
Choose 892BT if you want coding + bi-directional + speed.
Final Verdict

Mucar 892BT is one of the best multi-brand coding scanners I have tested. Coding works on Toyota, VAG and BMW. Full-system scan is extremely fast. Live data is excellent. DPF and TPMS functions worked every time.
I personally kept this tool as my main diagnostic scanner for quick scans, coding and used-car checks.
You should buy it if:
• You want OEM-style coding without paying for heavy tablets
• You check many used cars
• You want fast, reliable scanning
• You need DPF or TPMS services
• You want lifetime updates
You should skip it if:
• You need key programming (Xtool D8S better)
• You want a wired handheld only (CR Max+ is simpler)
How to save money:
Best price is on the official website.
Plans and upgrades should always be redeemed through your account dashboard.
Mucar 892BT vs Thinkscan 689BT?

Mucar 892BT and Thinkscan 689BT are basically the same scanner in different clothes — both have full system scans, bi-directional testing, and ECU coding.
But Mucar adds bonus features like built-in search, custom wallpapers, and even Candy Crush (yep). Thinkscan feels more professional and gets monthly updates.
Want all the differences laid out? Check out the full breakdown here

You have everything you will need for DIY repairs, checking used cars, code new features or even run smaller car shop.
Popular OBD2 guides
See all guidesBest OBD2 scanners in 2025
I constantly test new OBD-II scanners to give you the best options possible. Here is a full list of the best tools in all categories currently.


Responses