XTOOL D5S TESTED | Honest Review

I tested the XTOOL D5S on my Mazda and used it for engine, airbag, and service functions. This is a multi-system scanner, meaning it sits between a simple engine code reader and a full bi-directional scan tool. After updates and real testing, it proved more advanced than typical multisystem tools.

Affiliate Disclosure: iamcarhacker.com is an Amazon and other affiliate programs Associate. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Full Affiliate disclosure.

Sponsored Warning: I got this product for free to make a review. Despite that, I provide an honest review based on personal testing and share my truthful opinion of the product. Read more in sponsor policy.

Find the best price

What This Tool Actually Is

The D5S is a multi-system scanner. Not a full-system scanner. Not a coding tool. Not a workshop-grade tablet.

It is meant for DIY users who want:
• more modules than engine-only tools
• better live data
• some service procedures
• a clear tablet interface
• stable auto-scan

It fills the gap between OBD-only Bluetooth tools and bi-directional tablets like VO7 or D7.

Test Results on Real Cars

I tested it on a Mazda.

Cars used
• Mazda (no ABS / no AT module installed) / Skoda rapid

Setup and Updates

When unboxed, it was already charged.
Updating all brands took about one hour.
Once updated, it worked instantly.

Module Scan

Mazda had only engine and airbag modules installed.
D5S correctly detected both and scanned them without errors.

If your car has ABS, transmission, or more systems, D5S will scan those too.

Fault Codes

In engine control module:
• found more codes than the OBD-only menu
• showed 3 engine codes instead of one
That’s the main advantage of multisystem tools.

In airbag module:
• scanned correctly
• displayed proper SRS fault list

Live Data

Live data inside ECM showed about 60 parameters, compared to 21 parameters in OBD-only mode.

You can:
• view values
• open graphs
• create custom live-data pages (4 values per page)

Graphing worked smoothly.

Demand Self-Test

This feature tests relays, fuses, and system responses.
D5S ran the test and produced several CAN-related fault codes.
Useful for diagnosing electrical issues.

Clear Faults

Check engine light cleared successfully.
SRS clearing depends on the car – some modules allow clearing, some require fixed hardware.

Reporting

PDF report is clean and simple.
You can save or send immediately.

Manufacturer Specs vs Real Testing

Area	Manufacturer Claim	What I Saw in Testing
Multi-system coverage	yes	ECM and SRS scanned fine
ABS/Transmission	if present	Mazda had none installed
Service resets	15	confirmed menu present
Live data	yes	more values than OBD-only
Graphing	supported	smooth graphs
Auto-scan	yes	stable and fast

Hardware / Software / Plans / Internet Dependency

Hardware
• lightweight tablet
• wired OBD connection
• responsive touchscreen

Software
• clean UI
• easy navigation
• updates available regularly

Plans
• updates are free during normal XTOOL free window
• no subscriptions for functions

Internet
• needed for updates
• scanning works offline

Supported Service Resets

The D5S has 15 service resets, including:
• oil reset
• EPB service
• battery registration
• throttle reset
• DPF regen (diesel)
• SAS reset
• TPMS reset (basic)

They will not work on every car.
Car must support them.

On Mazda, some procedures were available.

Supported Languages

XTOOL translations are usually solid.
English is the most reliable.

Comparison Section

D5S vs Mucar 682

Mucar 682 is little more expensive but full-system + bi-directional tests on top of what xtool d5s does.

D5S advantages
• smoother interface
• more stable scanning
• deeper live data
• better special functions

Mucar 682 advantages
• cheaper
• simple UI

Feature	XTOOL D5S	Mucar 682
Modules	engine + more	engine + few
Service resets	15	fewer
Live data	stronger	basic
Scan stability	better	moderate
Price	higher	cheaper

If budget is tight → 682.
If you want smoother diagnostics → D5S.

D5S vs Dollarfix DF65

DF65 is a budget multi-system tool with very limited special functions.

D5S advantages
• better service coverage
• better live data
• more stable module detection
• cleaner UI

DF65 advantages
• cheaper
• enough for simple engine + ABS work

Feature	D5S	DF65
Service resets	15	few
Module scan	stronger	limited
Live data	many PIDs	basic
Build quality	higher	basic

D5S is clearly the more capable tool.

D5S vs XTOOL A30M

A30M is more of a full-system bi-directional tool through smartphone.
D5S is a multi-system tool with tablet.

A30M advantages
• full-system scan
• bi-directional tests
• more service resets
• deeper data
• stronger overall capability

D5S advantages
• tablet included
• simpler for beginners
• more stable for very old cars

Feature	D5S	A30M
System coverage	multi-system	full-system
Bi-di	no	yes
Coding	no	limited
Service resets	15	more
Ease of use	very easy	moderate

If you want bi-directional control, A30M is the better choice.
If you want a simple standalone device, pick D5S.

Final Verdict

XTOOL D5S is one of the better multisystem scanners I’ve tested.
It scans more modules than basic tools, gives deeper live data, has 15 useful service procedures, and the interface is smooth. Everything worked without weird errors.

If you want a scanner that’s more than an engine reader but not as complex or expensive as a full bi-directional tool, the D5S is a great middle option.

Who should buy
• DIY users wanting more than OBD-only tools
• beginners who want a tablet instead of phone apps
• people needing service resets and module scanning
• users with older cars that only have a few modules

Who should skip
• users needing full-system + bi-directional → choose A30M or VO7
• users needing coding → choose VO7 or a tablet with coding
• users on a very low budget → choose Mucar 682 or DF65

How to save money
Use official XTOOL store codes.
“iamcarhacker” for 15% off on official website.